A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Twentieth century has seen rapid advancements in every sphere of Science and Technology. The technological advancements have entailed the massive improvement in the production of every product, both for the necessity and luxury, including industrial and high tech. For instance, in the older ages, people used to wear the crude home-made clothes and shoe. But now, conversely, let alone speak of clothes and shoes, every item of usage is optimized for the best utilization. Although, today’s items are, very, durable, well-refined, convenient, marvelous, stylish and elegant, compared to the old-fashioned home-made products of the old ages, yet these resulted in the human beings’ increased dependency on the industrial products and the morally deceptive ideas fostered by them. Due to the commercial commodities increased and arguable unnecessary usage, Humans feel cocooned in this modern technological era, so much so that they are feel forced to consume, the high-tech appliances, even for whatever, be it very harmful for mental health and moral values. For instance, mobile phone is used for unnecessary and heinous apps, which, although, dispenses a sense of temporary joy, but ultimately results in various forms of moral compromises.
This dense and invisible net of enchantment and vulgar addictions gradually clouded human beings’ already held yardsticks for measuring one’s worth (which was through character). Hence, Todays’ world views and places the great people in terms of how much financial worth do they have. This is because of our paradigm shift from the pristinely positive values of honor, kindness and trust to the apparently inflated balloons of luxuries.
Additionally, the industrialization brought the gimmick of capitalization. The Capitalization is a deception, which, according to Carl Marx, tricks people into thinking that they are improving their conditions, however, instead they are just the mere tool in the entire machinery of the Capitalism. They are just improving and paving the way for the capitalism to propagate and thrive. This Capitalism lures them, through the glamours of industrializations and marketing (job prospects, entrepreneurships and ultimate benefits), whereby people are forced to believe that, now, being a capitalist is the biggest of all virtues.
The dangerously high dependency on the capitalism based thinking and industrial and high-tech products have forced us, in a fear to not lose their developments gained through the Capitalism, to change our standard for measuring one’s worth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | Nyahmeo | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Enkh_bold | 67 | view |
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 71
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, conversely, hence, however, if, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66062176166 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14277322508 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598445595855 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3229083499 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0797046067344 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262103523339 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342141937174 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053629441316 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461502454256 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.