The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The procedure elucidates a special method of collecting rainwater and how to clean it in order to get the drinking water in an Australian small town.
Overall, the process commences when it is raining and includes five essential steps, then terminates when the water will be pure.
To begin with, when the rain begins, a drain of the home will collect rainwater and send it to the long tubes in the first stage of the process. Subsequently, there is a liquid filter which serves to clean rainwater at the middle of the long pipes, then, purified water goes to the storage in the next stage. This colossal storage also has a tube that sends water to the water treatment, and that water treatment will clean the liquid from the other chemicals. At the final step, drinking water will send to the homes with the help of the pipes, and an Australian population can consume this pure liquid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-21 | honguyenlily | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | nigora@ | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | leminhthong098 | 61 | view |
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 78
- Due to increasing world demands for oil and gas energy people need to look for new sources of energy in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages of locating these sources outweigh disadvantages of damaging these places 67
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extant do you agree or disagree 67
- The maps show the change of Petland from 1980 to 2007 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66242038217 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41321432774 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 10.1939524556 43.030603864 24% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232676290882 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124008009059 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593544808245 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173960779466 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468316728052 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.