The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of
developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006
to 2010.
The table illustrates how much money charities had donated to developing countries by the US, EU and other countries to support technological development in 5 year period from 2006.
In generall, it is clear that there was a significant increase in total donated money throughout the years. Nevertheless, a slight decrease in the amount of money was witnessed in other countries in 2009.
There was a significant increase in the total aid given, from $15.7 billion in
2006 to $24.3 billion in 2009, rising sharply to $30 billion in the following
year. Looking at the US, the giving money started off at $9.7B in 2006 and rose gradually to $10.5B and $13.5B in 2007 and 2008, respectively. This figure increased dramatically to $18B in 2009 and reached a peak of $22.7B in 2010.
In EU countries, charities donated $3.3B in 2006 and then aid grew slowly to $3.8B in 2008, followed by a slight decrease in the next year before rising again to reach $4B in 2010. The similar trend was also witnessed in other countries, donations went up from $2.7B in 2006 to $3.3B at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | Chu Thị Hải | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and double room study area 61
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 78
- The graph below shows avarage carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60209424084 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74889552967 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7888665095 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392162136805 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157966526287 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15371555568 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188923109222 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161477995528 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60209424084 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74889552967 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7888665095 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392162136805 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157966526287 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15371555568 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188923109222 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161477995528 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.