Do you agree or disagree: the universities should spend more money in improving facilities(libraries, computer labs) than hiring famous teacher?
If the aim is to let university be better, what will that activity be? Although some believe improving facilities stands as the priority choice, it is hiring famous teacher contribute greatest benefits for students.
It is so argued that universities should spend more money on improving facilities such as cozy dormitory or advanced labs, because it could be used for propaganda and attract more students. The supporters of this idea must be reminded that, in practicality, although those facilities can comfort students, but it couldn’t fulfill what students truly require. By contrast, famous teacher often has a good teaching experience and great research ability. With more excellent papers writing from those professors, the rank of college may improve. Besides students graduate from this college could have more competitiveness and more chance to enter better companies. This is exactly what students need and could actually attract more students.
Supporters of allocating money into amenities may still argue that without an advanced lab, students could not research some certain topic. The real picture of this argument, however, is that most of the labs universities build are outdating, and companies has already not used those old technology. Furthermore, those labs could only be used for few students researching certain project, so the money could not be equally distributed to all students. By comparison, famous professor usually has connection between some famous companies which has the most advanced machines could allow students practice for. Moreover, universities can allow those famous teachers using big classroom, or film online courses for those who couldn’t take the class or even students in other colleges. With this proposal, money could be used for more students.
So beneficial is hiring famous teacher that it must be taken into more serious consideration than improving facilities. It is this choice that can benefit the most students and let them enter better companies.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require all graduate students to take courses public speaking Give specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- People can solve important problems in daily life on their own or with the help from families so the help from government is not necessary 60
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 60
- One of the greatest challenges in modern society is to have up to date skills for one s work To better achieve this the government should give all adults over the age of 25 a training course to catch up their work skills Do you think this is an effective 70
- Nowadays people spend more time in their work or study If the purpose is to learn something within a small amount of time which do you prefer l learn a sport that you have never learned before 2 learn how to cook 3 learn to make something by hand making c 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'contribute the greatest'.
Suggestion: contribute the greatest
...ity choice, it is hiring famous teacher contribute greatest benefits for students. It is so argu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 52.1666666667 42% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50803858521 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77061101532 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543408360129 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9059441061 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0625 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221664273666 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818799261413 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670251527816 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155024698244 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215813830908 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.