Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
It is widely believed that the art should be free of governmental involvement. However, there are those, who deem that state funding might be beneficial for the art’s development. Personally I contend, that both sides could have a reasonable argumentation, nevertheless I stick to the idea that the art as a sphere should grow and expand without external help.
Art should express feelings and emotions, what is possible only if the main idea, which is covert in this object belongs solely to the author. In other words, the extraneous involvement in the very hast of the art’s idea may spoil its gist and make it biased to some extent. As the example, of the art, which is funded by the state and reflects the governmental agenda is the one in USSR. If one have a chance to visit any of the Russian fine art museum, he or she will found copious of paintings dedicated to the idea of the flourishing and prosperous country. However, on the other hand, in the very same time, when this paintings founded by the totalitarian government have be done, there were many other arts, which were not visible to the public as such crafts were created by the underground painters. It means that the only arts, which Russian could contemplate is that which was sponsored by the governmental institutions.
In the meantime, sometimes the governmental help is crucial, and that might happen if the sphere of art in the country is in the recession. But it is still important that the state belongs to the neutral position when it comes to the arts agenda and it doesn’t have any opportunity to affect it. Moreover, in this case the government could take a role of a sponsor of enlighten program about arts and culture among its citizens. For instance, the could be lectures or free tickets for children on some stage versions of classic novels or ballet.
To recapitulate, the government shouldn’t be involved in the art sphere as it might affect its agenda. However, in some cases its funding is the only way for art to overcome the crisis. Than the state might sponsor art, but still remaining unbiased.
- The chart gives a more detailed look at changes in the consumption of such personal items as stereos tennis racquets perfumes CDs toys and photographic films in four selected European countries 78
- Many students start looking for jobs as soon as they graduate Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- The Internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 73
- Is it more enjoyable to work only 3 days a week for short hours or to work 5 days a week for longer hours 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e only if the main idea, which is covert in this object belongs solely to the aut...
^^
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...other hand, in the very same time, when this paintings founded by the totalitarian g...
^^^^
Line 2, column 679, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ded by the totalitarian government have be done, there were many other arts, which...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...e neutral position when it comes to the arts agenda and it doesn’t have any opportun...
^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...nly way for art to overcome the crisis. Than the state might sponsor art, but still ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, in other words, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78021978022 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71580906667 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489010989011 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2918421155 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332520711408 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123234784163 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638118523813 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228286559163 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441752199339 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.