Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require all graduate students to take courses public speaking Give specific examples and details to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Universities should require all graduate students to take courses public speaking. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

There was a lot of discussion about whether universities should require every graduate students to take public speaking class or not. Although some believe this policy is necessarily for every students, there still lots of disadvantages within it.

It is so argued that school should force all graduate students to take speaking courses, because during the class, students can learn something crucial for them in the future. The supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, graduate students are busy in doing research. They may have no time to take the class. Even they did, they may fall asleep or doing other things without listening the lecture. Besides, students may have few practice time during the class owing to large amount of students. By contrast, there are still lots of way to train students' speaking skill. For example, during every meeting, professor can instruct their student how to present well. Students not only have lots of time to practice but also learn from their friends.

Supporters of requiring all graduate students to take speaking class may still argue that those students are likely to be a professor in the future, so explaining a theory well is an important ability for them. The real picture of this statement, however, is that students who take the courses are going to teach different subjects. The way to articulate physic, music or literature theories are not same. Physic teacher may need to explain how to derive a formula. However, a history teacher must proficient in telling a story. Therefore, gathering all students to learn speaking skills is not practical. By comparison, during discussing with advisors, students can realize how they speak in similar subject. Moreover, those advising professors have years of experience. They know how to explain well so that everyone can realize.

Taking a speaking course is not necessarily a cog to make the machine of students run. There are still lots disadvantages such as having no time to take the class, or learning some skills which is not suitable for what they teach.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2020-11-29	Chris Lee	70	view
2020-11-29	Chris Lee	70	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user Chris Lee :

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether universities should require every gradu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture of this statement, however, is that students who take the courses are going ...
^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to speak'.
Suggestion: to speak
...refore, gathering all students to learn speaking skills is not practical. By comparison,...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12941176471 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61857220928 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520588235294 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9481523388 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0476190476 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1904761905 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232418942139 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073308604492 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766511700264 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15419975254 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028305943307 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.