Today there are a lot of websites providing news on the internet. Some people believe that these websites will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is an undeniable fact that the internet has revolutionized the world and numerous web pages provide news on the internet. Owing to this, some people opine that traditional newspapers and magazines will be completely replaced by such websites. I completely agree with the aforementioned statement not only because of their easy accessibility but also due to the instant notification feature they provide.
The primary reason why I believe that newspapers and magazines will be completely replaced by the internet is because of its convenience. In other words, in this era of technological advancements, people are connected to the internet world almost every time with the help of electronic gadgets such as mobile phones and laptops. Therefore, they can read news and articles on the websites at their own convenient time without physically carrying newspapers and magazines to read. Take the example of the renowned newspaper “The Hindu”, which updates news on the web instantly and it has about 1 million subscribers, who read news on their website online. Hence, the above example speaks volumes that the internet would probably replace newspapers in the time to come.
Another reason to believe is the advantage of instant news notifications. Since technology and the internet gives us the facility of providing instant news with the help of notifications to the subscribed users, it has become possible that people are notified instantly about the current affairs, which has an edge over the paper newspaper, where one get news the next day. For example, the newspapers in every country enlist news on the next day of the occurrence of incident whereas websites updates news on a second basis.
However, some people are in the favour that traditional newspapers and magazines can never be replaced by website news because the older generation finds it difficult to operate electronic devices and reading from paper has its own comfort to them. Hence, the ritual of reading news from traditional newspaper will continue to exist.
To conclude, I wholeheartedly agree that websites on the internet would completely replace the tradition of reading physical newspapers and magazines because of their ease in readiness and the feature of instant updates.
- In many countries online shopping is becoming more and more popular Some people think that this is having a negative impact on society To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the teengers years are the happiest times of Most people s lives Others think that adults life brings more happiness in spite of greater 78
- Some believe that advances in technology are increasing the gap between rich and poor while others think the opposite is happening Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- Giving detailed description of crimes in newspapers and on television has bad consequences Some people therefore suggest that the government should impose restrictions on them To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- You have recently shifted in a rental apartment with your family However there are some problems with the apartment Write a letter to the landlord In your letter Describe the problem Demand the solution for the problem Inform him what you will do if the p 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 32.9175257732 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 26.3917525773 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 937.175257732 205% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 360.0 206.0 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33055555556 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90008381105 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 127.690721649 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 290.88556701 213% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4525872575 44.8134815571 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.071428571 76.5299724578 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 16.8248392259 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 4.34317383033 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346458209594 0.216113520407 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133488875394 0.0766984524023 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616748848431 0.0603063233224 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215171956932 0.12726935374 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294137292612 0.0580467560999 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 8.37731958763 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 70.7449484536 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 8.71597938144 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 41.2886597938 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 8.62886597938 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 32.9175257732 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 26.3917525773 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 937.175257732 205% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 360.0 206.0 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33055555556 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90008381105 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 127.690721649 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 290.88556701 213% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4525872575 44.8134815571 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.071428571 76.5299724578 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 16.8248392259 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 4.34317383033 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346458209594 0.216113520407 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133488875394 0.0766984524023 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616748848431 0.0603063233224 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215171956932 0.12726935374 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294137292612 0.0580467560999 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 8.37731958763 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 70.7449484536 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 8.71597938144 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 41.2886597938 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 8.62886597938 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.