The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The data table illustrates the trends in usage of rail transport in four different countries during the 2007.
Looking throughout the whole perspective, Japan accounted for the largest share for both number of people, using transport (27 thousand) and kilometers per head of population (1980 km per person). As opposite to Japanese, rail transport is not preferred among USA citizens, that makes up only one hundred part of number of Japan passengers. Also, quiet similar picture is in passenger kilometers per head of population in America, that equals to only 80.
It is of note, UK and Italy have similar patterns in rail transport turnover. Throughout a year 5,9 and 5,5 thousand of people respectively traveled by rail transport means, where average distance duration totals approximately from 770 to 780 km per person.
Turning to a cargo caried, in Italy, UK and Japan it is averaging around 22-23 billions of tones. Whereas the USA occupies the leading position in cargo turnover and the amount of carried goods is dramatically high, around 2820 billions of tones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-01 | Anastasia0511 | 84 | view |
- The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show information about weekly hours in Australia in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement What other measures do you think might be effective 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2820 billion'.
Suggestion: 2820 billion
...ried goods is dramatically high, around 2820 billions of tones.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7697727012 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6256229184 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130428608252 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613807740234 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733090928745 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965774123369 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859943659501 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.