Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, tertiary education provides a wide range of discipline including art, literature, science and technology. Stranded in the ocean of knowledge while just graduated from high school, undergraduates are steered to believe by many people that subjects involving science and technology will be an effective mean which can guarantee the future. While others suggest that college students shall be freely choosing which subject to learn.
It is saying that if something is done passionately, the outcome is likely to be impressed. That connotation with the idea that with devotion in certain thing, human can do it better. Let’s take these as an example, a teacher may fail to fulfill his or her obligations if they do not keep the students at the center of education or a doctor may hit the bottom if he or she only focus on the money rather than saving people lives. Furthermore, devoting in a particular subject matter can stimulate the higher opportunity to find a decent, well-paid future job matching the interests. Like Taylor Swift or Justin Bieber, these chosen to follow their interest in singing and have had successful careers. It can be seen that obviously the singers’ choices was not science or technology, still, they have made a great fortune. Therefore, limit university students to learn only subjects regarding science or technology is not necessary.
On the other hand, the line between useful and useless subjects is a blur. Hardly anyone can make a clear definition and example on which subject is useful and which is not. Since the lists of the most affluent people in the world involved many in the science and technology section, like Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gate or Elon Musk, it is undoubtedly that those two are the important fields in the world general development. Even then, knowledge of the human body, the nature, the culture and the history surround us is also crucial to our live in certain aspect.
To conclude, limitation shall not be impose on subject choosing and student have a right to choose which or what they want to learn.
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems? 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 89
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ve mean which can guarantee the future. While others suggest that college students sh...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'focuses', 'focusses'.
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
...or may hit the bottom if he or she only focus on the money rather than saving people ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Hardly' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
... useful and useless subjects is a blur. Hardly anyone can make a clear definition and ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70404105306 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592485549133 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9869032304 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261001980455 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079279281859 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508436429563 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147301598863 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340033918136 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.