Today children are spending much more time watching TV compared to the past. Why do you think this happens? Is this a positive or a negative change?
It is true that rate of children watching TV has been increasing over the last decades. There are several reasons behind of that, and I believe that this is negative change.
Firstly, today’s world children have a range of cartoon channels on the TV compared to past, which leads to children allocate more and more time in front of the TV. For example, there were a few cartoon channels that children have over the last decades. However, nowadays many new cartoon channels have been established. Secondly, children usually mimic their role models, who are their parents. After get to home from work, they tend to watch TV rather than interest in their children. As a result of that children also participate in that particular activity. Finally, today’s children a little bit more unsocial opposed to past time. Unsocial is one of factor that would cause less outdoor activities and more indoor activities such as watching TV and playing online games.
To begin with, these all reasons cause a few negative consequences. Perhaps major result is that while children are affected by what they see in the Tv. Most of the programmes include violence and immoral attitude. Children admit these behaviours normal unconsciously, which leads children to commit the crimes. Another consequence for children is that researcher has shown that people who watch more and more tv have less productivity on their brain and as a consequence their less successful on their ambitions or works.
In conclusion, TV is one of essential factors, which affected children’s daily life adversely. If this negative change is not blocked by families or the government, children more likely have less success and to turn into the crime easily
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | murtaza | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | santhip123 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-21 | Rishiraj Kansara | 90 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | faisal vhora | 77 | view |
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extends do you agree or disagree 73
- Today children are spending much more time watching TV compared to the past Why do you think this happens Is this a positive or a negative change 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- It is necessary for parents to attend a parenting training course to bring their children up To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rather than interest in their children. As a result of that children also particip...
^^
Line 2, column 590, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...r activity. Finally, today’s children a little bit more unsocial opposed to past time. Uns...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...n a little bit more unsocial opposed to past time. Unsocial is one of factor that would c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09893992933 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65347733212 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3498373603 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294191021607 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962767872694 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719493771027 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185405247469 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361080691868 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.