Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether the authorities of countries should focus their money on vocational training or university schools is a debatable question among people. In my opinion, both kinds of training should be equally invested by the government.
On the one hand, university programs deserve to be dramatically invested by the government in every countries around the world because only universities with a long process can train people in complicated fields such as medicine and computer science. It is true that a medical school can offer a 6-year course, while a student in Al science may need 4 years or more to complete their studies. As a result, students have enough time to memorize significant amount of theory and do a variety of necessary in- practical experiments. Without university, we will lack outstanding physicians who can diagnose tremendous diseases and excellent computers engineers who invent automatically state-of-the-art devices that enhance humanity’s life.
On the other hand, I would argue that it is also important for the government to spend the national budget on vocational schools. Those schools are the main sources to train blue collar workers, who are responsible to do essential occupations in society such as bakers, carpenters or social workers… Lack of vocational training may cause an imbalance of the workforce as manual workers are less than white collar ones. Therefore, more money concentrates in vocational establishes will help to advance them both in the quality and the capacity so that they can graduate more students who are excel at practical skills and know their jobs as soon as their start.
In conclusion, both vocational schools and universities have important roles by their own and no one can replace the other. Therefore, the government should invest in them equally so that those schools can produce an equal number of good manual workers and office ones for the development of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-08 | Hanachan123456789 | 84 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with 73
- Some people say that learning online is the best way to learn whereas some claim that it is still better to attend a class with a teacher Discuss both sides of the argument and then give me your opinion 80
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...so that they can graduate more students who are excel at practical skills and know thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'excelled'.
Suggestion: excelled
...they can graduate more students who are excel at practical skills and know their jobs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27096774194 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96504786554 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2313051247 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.545454545 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210121378673 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787662087243 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476804889974 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131005966221 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614518878739 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...so that they can graduate more students who are excel at practical skills and know thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'excelled'.
Suggestion: excelled
...they can graduate more students who are excel at practical skills and know their jobs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27096774194 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96504786554 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2313051247 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.545454545 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210121378673 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787662087243 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476804889974 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131005966221 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614518878739 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.