Anyone can use a mobile phone to answer the work call and home call at any place, or 7 days a week. Do you think there is more negative or positive on both individuals and society？
It is true that mobile phones enable everyone to receive calls from work and home anywhere and anytime, which might bring great convenience and high efficiency. However, in my view, there are more negative effects than positive effects.
For individuals, the boundary between work and life is blurred. People used to enjoy their leisure time out of working hours, but now they have to stand by in case their supervisors call them to deal with extra work or emergencies. Their rest could also be disturbed if the phone rings at midnight. In addition, in offices, employers feel difficult to concentrate on what they are doing when receiving home calls frequently, thus impairing work efficiency. What is worse, if people answer the phone while driving, they can hardly pay full attention to the road situation, which might cause car accidents that damage their life.
For society, talking on the phone in public places could lead to much noise, even disastrous consequences. Supposing that someone takes personal calls loudly in the movie theatre, the perfect atmosphere would be completely ruined. More seriously, phone calls in hospitals may distract doctors who are performing surgeries. Another example is on airplanes. Some passengers use mobile phones when it is taking off or landing, and this may pose a threat to flight safety.
In conclusion, while answering calls regardless of time and space has certain benefits, I believe that its drawbacks to individuals and society are more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25619834711 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68334266288 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.690082644628 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0103209729 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8461538462 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324204849771 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919362946229 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487251838152 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177872499901 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176428690261 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.