the amount of money spent on books in 5 countries between 1995 and 2005

Essay topics:

the amount of money spent on books in 5 countries between 1995 and 2005

The line graph illustrates the figure for money spent on books in 4 countries from 1995 to 2005. Overall, there was a fluctuation in the amount of money spent on books in 4 nations. German, while, reached the highest the money spent on books during this period.
As can be seen from the diagram that, there was a slight increase in the amount of money spent on books in Germany from 80 million dollars in 1995 to 90 million dollars in 1999. Before decreasing steadily by approximately 5 million dollars between 1999 and 2003. After that, the figure for money has spent on books of German rose dramatically during next 2 years. Followed by, in 1995, the amount of money spent on books in Austria went up significantly from about 55 million dollars to 60 million dollars in 2001. Then, the amount of money spent on books in Austria experienced an improve sharply at a little under 90 million dollars and reached the highest in 2005.
As the graph shows, the Italian's money was spent on books grow slightly before, fluctuating over next 8 years and reach a peak at more than 60 million dollars in 2005. Following this, the amount of money spent on books of French experienced an increase slightly from 30 million dollars in 1995 to 40 million dollars in 1999. Next, there was a steady decrease by around 1 million dollars between 1999 and 2001. After, there was a considerable increase to over 50 million dollars during 4 years period.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-12 tata 78 view
2024-10-12 tata 61 view
2024-10-12 tata view
2024-10-12 tata 73 view
2024-10-12 tata 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y spent on books in Austria experienced an improve sharply at a little under 90 million do...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... million dollars between 1999 and 2001. After, there was a considerable increase to o...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65748031496 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46147387102 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429133858268 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6131237855 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5833333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420646704408 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200507659927 0.103423049105 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117875746111 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367286269919 0.15604864568 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132890599207 0.0819641961636 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.