The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016

Essay topics:

The amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year,2016.

The pie chart illustrates the cash flow of a charity of children in the United States in 2016.
Overall, the total income of the children’s charity exceeded the total outcome of the same charity during 2016. Despite the highest proportion of sources of the children's charity was for donated food, the biggest portion of expenditures was for program services.
The two biggest ways of income for the charity of children in 2016 was for donated food and community contribution with, 86.6% and 10.4% respectively. However, the most two methods of outcome of the children's charity during the same period was for program services and fundraising, with the percentage of 95.6% and 2.6% respectively.
The remaining sources of income for the juveniles charity in 2016 was for program revenue with percentage of 2.2% and other ways of funding numbered in total 0.8%. Whereas, the last approach for outcome for the same charity during the same period amounted 1.6% for management and general.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-12 tata 78 view
2024-10-12 tata 61 view
2024-10-12 tata view
2024-10-12 tata 73 view
2024-10-12 tata 73 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'juveniles'' or 'juvenile's'?
Suggestion: juveniles'; juvenile's
...The remaining sources of income for the juveniles charity in 2016 was for program revenue...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68560109161 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447204968944 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2633389133 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169389189201 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107617815254 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452573974897 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134303867765 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033315827854 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.