The 3 piecharts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summarise the info by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant
The given pie chart describes the annual expenditure of a school in UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001. It can be clearly seen that the maximum amount was spent on teachers’ salaries and minimum on insurance.
In 1981the amount spent on teachers’ salaries was 40% which increased by 10% in 1991 and again decreased to 45% in the year 2001. Similar fluctuation was observed in the expenditure of resources which increased from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991 and again decreased to 9% in 2001%. The spending on furniture was 15% in 1981 which decreased by 10% till 1991 and again rose to 23% in 2001. The percentage expenditure on other workers’ salaries showed a constant decreasing trend of 28% in 1981, 22% in 1991 and 15% in 2001. On the other hand the spending on insurance increases gradually over the years from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001.
To sum up it can be concluded that the total spending on salaries was always more than all other expenses.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 66
- The 3 piecharts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.Summarise the info by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant 90
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is place to learn this.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 95
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what way technology affected the type of relationship people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 60
- the graph and table below give the information about the water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the info by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison wherever relevant. 80
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 85 100
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 737 1000
No. of Different Words: 85 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.31 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.585 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 43 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 2.643 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.502 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.689 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.215 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4