The bar chart illustrates how much each type of household equipment consumes electricity and costs per year. Overall, spa pump and heater have the highest consumption in regards to both electricity and expense whereas electric blanket has the lowest.
About 2250 kwh/year and more than $166 are the amount of electricity and expenditure respectively needed for spa pump and heater. Compared to pool pump, it has relatively low figures at nearly $125/year and approximately 1500kwh/year. Furthermore, other domestic appliances witnessed electricity usage and spending lower than $83/year and 1000kwh/year respectively except for refrigerator.
It is evident that the lowest outlay and electricity consumption belongs to electric blanket. In comparison to microwave oven and television, these devices have higher figures than the electric blanket. Moreover, they have the same data as each other in relation to the amount of electricity utilized and expense per year. Similarly, water bed heater and clothes dryer' electricity usage and spending are equal at below 1000kwh/year or below $83/year.
- success is often measured by wealth and material belongings Do you think wealth is the best measure of success What makes a successful person 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- the chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 84
- SOME THINK THAT CLIMATE CHANGE REFORMS WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT BUSINESS OTHERS FEEL THEY ARE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BUSINESSES DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 78
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness Why is happiness difficult to define How can people achieve happiness 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...and heater have the highest consumption in regards to both electricity and expense whereas el...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69938650307 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05076424566 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.8830218122 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252403030754 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114554297342 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486481561824 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181618328327 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321599972981 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.