The basis of job search always varies depending upon the priority of job seeker, but two elements are most common in everyone priorities are high salary or job security, but which one is most critical, it always a part of the debate. In my perspective, both arguments are reasonable and will elaborate below.
Some people believe, searching job while keeping job security as a priority is not a good approach because no organization would prefer to sustain those employees whose expectation is just to be in that job with no will to perform well. At any point of time, organizations may throw out those who are not performing well, there is no such kind of job security in any organization. Everyone must showcase their professional skills in meeting intended output, then it is better to ask for the high salary package instead of looking for job security, which no one can guarantee.
While there are some people who oppose the above statement and according to them, Job with good perks demand more commitment from the job holder and to meet those commitment level a person need to engage himself with the job completely and in this scenario, many sacrifices their family time just to justify the salary associated with the job. Also, they have a perception that whenever any organization suffered from any financial decrement, they fired people who are working at a high income.
In conclusion, Job security can be the most important factor for any job seeker, but no one guarantees it. If a person has a good set of skills and can perform well should seek for a high-income job not to worry about job security.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re reasonable and will elaborate below. Some people believe, searching job while...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this commitment' or 'those commitments'?
Suggestion: this commitment; those commitments
...mitment from the job holder and to meet those commitment level a person need to engage himself w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82795698925 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67888479326 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0276937225 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.666666667 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284661334939 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123870043279 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702683824665 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187373717183 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328725033026 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.