There is a debate whether money should be spent for building new rapid train railway lines or bettering current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter view and will explain the reasons.
On the one side, using money on constructing rapid train railway lines is good because it can support more rapid trains to operate. Since rapid train can operate in rapid speed and has special railway, it can help reducing traffic jam. Thus, the more rapid train railway lines that are available, the less traffic jam will occur. However, due to its high fare, people will most likely to be reluctant to switch from their private vehicles to rapid train. Consequently, traffic jam can not be overcome by the existence of more rapid trains.
On the one side, spending money on bettering current public transportation is great because it will make them to be safer and more comfortable. This will encourage people to transport using public transportation instead of using their private transportation. Moreover, because of its affordable fare, people will most likely to be willing to switch from their private transportation to public transportation. As a result, the existence of public transportation will help reducing traffic congestion that occur in the country.
In conclusion, while constructing rapid train railway lines is good because it can support more rapid trains to operate, which will help reducing traffic congestion problem, it has expensive fare which make people reluctant to ride them. Meanwhile, public transportation has more affordable fares which will make people willing to ride them, and therefore will reducing traffic congestion that occur in the country.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...ed and has special railway, it can help reducing traffic jam. Thus, the more rapid train...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...ence of public transportation will help reducing traffic congestion that occur in the co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...apid trains to operate, which will help reducing traffic congestion problem, it has expe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...illing to ride them, and therefore will reducing traffic congestion that occur in the co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33955223881 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8584208448 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440298507463 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7025250041 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194321985296 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935181784636 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626275691431 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145389156244 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431719667206 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.