Do you agree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letter, emails or telephones calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Constant technological developments have caused big changes on how we communicate each other. Although, that might be an easy way to use cell phones, laptops or other devices as a form of interaction I believe that face-to-face communication is better. There are manifold reasons for that and I will explain them in the following essay.
First of all, in-person communication is more valuable cause we can express emotions. No one can deny that talking to a person who is close to us would give us profound understanding on what exactly his personality is. By his countenance and body language we can gauge reactions and can determine whether he or she is lying or not. Consequently, that would help us in establishing imperative business nexuses with partners with no fear that we will be deceived. If we are relying solely on phone calls or chats as ways of communication, we tend to be in fallacy. I will never forget the conversation I had on my cell phone with a person presenting himself as a bank employee and asking me for my card number in order to verify my newly opened account. However, I was quite unsure and didn't give any private information to dubious people that can take the advantage of me. That's why I truly prefer face-to-face communication.
Furthermore, if we make an afield connection via social medias or electronic devices we wouldn't be able to introduce other people in our conversation. In-person connection has a boon in terms of widening our acquaintances and meeting new people from different walk of lives and cultures. In addition, newly introduced people can show us miscellaneous things related to their local customs and traditions. Me and one of my friends were making a Skype conversation due to the reason that we are in different countries. My friend wanted to add to our video talk some of his pals who I don't know. In fact, we will meet for the first time on Skype. When we managed to make a talk I show to the new guy some traditional rose oil that is the essential commodity in my country that huge percent of the economic export rely on. My friend knows perfectly how rose oil smells and looks like, however his friend is not familiar and can't feel the pleasant odor. Therefore, he wasn't impressed and couldn't make a better imagination about our valuable product. If we had made that conversation in-person, he would have changed his opinion about rose oil, because he would have felt the sense.
To sum up, there are numerous advantages of face-to-face conversation over cell phone or internet ones. We are less likely to fell into trap and be victim of a deceiver. Also, we can introduce people and products to others so much as they can feel, see, taste and change opinion about a particular things.
- What are the qualities or features of a good newspaper current affairs television program or news website Use specific details and examples to explain your answer 90
- Some people prefer to live in the countryside or in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 90
- The music you listen to says a lot about the kind of person you are How far do you agree with this Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Too many young people these days are unhealthy and or overweight What advice would you give somebody who wanted to become fit and healthy 78
- The similarities between the internet and television 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 785, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ccount. However, I was quite unsure and didnt give any private information to dubious...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 873, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ople that can take the advantage of me. Thats why I truly prefer face-to-face communi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... social medias or electronic devices we wouldnt be able to introduce other people in ou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o our video talk some of his pals who I dont know. In fact, we will meet for the fir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... will meet for the first time on Skype. When we managed to make a talk I show to the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 921, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... however his friend is not familiar and cant feel the pleasant odor. Therefore, he w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 964, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...t feel the pleasant odor. Therefore, he wasnt impressed and couldnt make a better ima...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 984, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...odor. Therefore, he wasnt impressed and couldnt make a better imagination about our val...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
...e and change opinion about a particular things.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75523012552 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88530738172 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564853556485 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8279252181 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7083333333 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10988229333 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365039156881 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547478104282 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100022006732 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836967732469 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.