It is widely excepted that in many countries around the world.
It is widely excepted that in many countries around the world, there is an increasing number of tubes are becoming problematic. This essay will explore the main reasons of this issue and then describe the possible effects of the problem.
In my point of view, the foremost causes of traffic jams are the shortness of the road and plurality of transports. Currently, as a result of building modern, high and huge apartments, the roads are becoming very small. This results of governments allow to people build apartments and on a daily basis the number of corks are rising. Moreover, the problem is accentuated by the growing number of transportation. For example, around 85-90% of people whole of the world are using transportation.
The possible effects of this problem include dramatically rising of accidents which are ending with bad effects and jamming is also getting people valuable time. At first, an increasing number of crashes are not only problem for people, but also it is issue of government. For instance, as a result of failures government losing their community and there is a falling down of at the head of country. Secondly, traffic jams are the problems of time management and it is also room argument about it. People are wasting their time in the jamming. For example, in the European countries where traffic lights are switched off, there we can see a several issue of accident.
To sum up, the number of tubes is a big problem that affects a lot of people nowadays. It is mainly caused by shortness way of the streets and results in severe significantly rising of crashes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-18 | langxuyen0806 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Hang2311 | 96 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | MONKEY99 | 96 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 61
- the graph below shows avrage carbon dioxeid emissions per person in the Uk italy partugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- This chart tries to introduce different places where the internet is surfing by humanity during five years 78
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 ang 1990 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Australia 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...mall. This results of governments allow to people build apartments and on a daily basis t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'roomed'.
Suggestion: roomed
...blems of time management and it is also room argument about it. People are wasting t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun issue seems to be countable; consider using: 'several issues'.
Suggestion: several issues
...ts are switched off, there we can see a several issue of accident. To sum up, the number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88970588235 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74845623545 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7926776862 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140625452485 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524681968302 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146219987469 0.0667982634062 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108405837607 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144151415593 0.056905535591 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.