For hundreds of years, people have never stopped debating about people's personality and one of the most interesting characteristics of the human is leadership. Although it seems plausible at first glimpse that no one can be trained to be a leader, I would counter this point of view due to some reasons. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following essay.
Above all, however the general belief is that everyone is born with his/her personality and circumstances have nothing to do with it, once someone is born, it is too late to achieve some special features, some reaches in my country demonstrate that this belief is totally wrong. Take a research which was conducted in Tehran University, for example. Even though it is difficult, if not possible, to consider real people with real lives, they have regarded one hundred people in their research. They figured out that people can be educated to achieve some specific quality such as leadership. Hence, one can learn it.
The other reason which deserves some words here is that there are stark differences between some siblings, which reveal that nurture is more important factor than nature in forming people's personalities. In other words, our environment can promote us to gain some good/bad points which one of these points is being a leader. My cousins are compelling examples of that. One of them is a mayor of a city in my country while the other is a simple employee in the bank. As a result, these types of distinctive features let us find that statement kind of silly.
Another subtle point which I should deem lies on the fact that there are a number of children all around the word who were born in some poor families where there were no sign of leadership, whereas they became some excellent leaderships. For instance, Abraham Lincoln, whose father did shoe shine services in some streets of the USA. As we know, he was one the best presidents of the USA. There lots of other stories like that which show there is no connection between the genes and people's personality.
To sum up, although people's personality do not fall in the extreme ends of the personality continuum. In other words, there is evidence that whether nurture has more impact on person's character or nature, but based on aforementioned arguments, I strongly believe that everyone can be taught to be a great leader.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should provide people with the free internet access 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phones online games and social networking Web sites 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 70
- TPO 29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...that whether nurture has more impact on persons character or nature, but based on afore...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i mean, kind of, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81975308642 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66981295872 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1237745365 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.736842105 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156513367174 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478255637186 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317793134239 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858055601646 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343178495537 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.