In many countries paying for things using mobile phone cellphone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages

Essay topics:

In many countries, paying for things using mobile phone (cellphone) apps is becoming increasingly common.
Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?

In the contemporary society, using mobile apps to make payments has become increasingly popular. Although some people opine that there are several drawbacks to this method, many people have supported the notion after experiencing their benefits. This essay will delve into the pros and cons of paying via online app before giving a personal opinion.
To begin with, there are numerous advantages of paying via apps. The most prominent advantage is the process saves time as people do not have to stand in long queues anymore. In fact, this can be done with a few clicks by people of all age despite their busy schedule or f they do not have any one to help them. For instance, senior citizens do not have to depend upon their children or travel to the bank to pay their utility bills. This can be done with a few clicks from the comforts of their home via an application installed on their devices. Furthermore, due to the flexibility offered by these applications, there is no need to carry cash around and be worried about being mugged.
However, there are certain drawbacks of having credit stored in personal devices. Cyber crimes has become more prevalent with the advent of technology and hackers, nowadays, can easily get access to an account thereby making fraudulent payments which might be unknown to the user. While paying bills extra charges are incurred by the application, such as service fee or transaction charge, which is sometimes unreasonable.
In order to counter these adversaries several measures can be taken such as setting two factor authentication, so that when anyone tries to login to the system an alert message is sent to the user. The extra charges can be avoided by paying the amount in smaller chunks that falls below the minimal amount, although it might be time consuming.
To conclude, using apps in mobile devices are more convenient and time saving for the society. Although there are some disadvantages, they can be overcome with appropriate measures. Hence, it can be clearly seen that the advantages outstrip the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-15 yasaman-pooshidani 73 view
2022-06-11 minhhh123 84 view
2022-02-09 bilal_chaudhry 61 view
2022-01-23 shadow1222 73 view
2021-09-10 ernchawla 84 view
Essays by user smiley :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...f paying via online app before giving a personal opinion. To begin with, there are numerous adv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...eir busy schedule or f they do not have any one to help them. For instance, senior citi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, so, then, while, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97982708934 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66375347135 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585014409222 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4560411323 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.647058824 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187111338878 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652425897332 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641052333837 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107476321075 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632537932958 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.