Dear Sir,
I am writing this letter regarding my hotel booking which was made on 10th December by your agency at Hotel Andrew on lake success street, New Hyde park. As it was a business trip, the booking was completed by our company representative for a week starting from 14th December to 18th December 2020.
At the onset, let me provide you the details about my reservation. Although the booking was made for a business trip, room was booked for my name under corporate account. According to the company policy the reservation was made through your travel agency’s website that is www.icims.travel.co.in. Once the booking was confirmed, I was provided with a booking reference number AZTNYH325 for my reservation at hotel Andrew New Hyde park, New York. As it was a corporate trip, we booked a room with easy access to all professional business segment amenities. My Room number was 152 and booking included accessibility to meeting rooms, conference hall and printer rooms. A single occupancy room was booked which costed 157$ a day.
Further, I would like to complaint about certain situations that I faced during my stay. Although my check-in time was 9:00am in the morning, I had to wait for 2 hours at reception due to unavailability of the internet connection on their end. Once I checked-in to the hotel, I noticed that hygiene standards were extremely poor and not even close what we have been presented at the time of the booking. Next, the staff was not very co-operative in assisting the guests for their requirements. Besides that, their printer was very old and they applied additional charges for using copier machine even though we booked the package including free access.
Lastly, I would like to provide some suggestions regarding my experience for the hotel management. The hotel management needs to recruit staff with more experience in hospitality industry so that they can cater their guests efficiently and understand their requirements. Also, there is large scope of improvement for the cleanliness and quality standards for the essentials provided within the rooms. In fact, room costs were not even justifiable to the quality of services offered to their guests.
Hope this letter deserves your utmost attention!
Yours Faithfully, 23/1/2021
Richard Ham.
- Write a letter to the organizer who booked hotel for you Meeting details What u didn t like about the hotel What you want organizer to do 78
- Your local newspaper wants to reward people who have contributed a lot to the community Write a letter to the newspaper In your letter suggest someone who deserves the reward mention what they have done to help the community say what reward you would like 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Dear Sir, I am writing this letter regarding my ho...
^^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$157'.
Suggestion: $157
... occupancy room was booked which costed 157$ a day. Further, I would like to compl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, lastly, regarding, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.48453608247 254% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 32.9175257732 131% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.85567010309 363% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 937.175257732 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 374.0 206.0 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16310160428 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 3.78020617076 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93810242855 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 127.690721649 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550802139037 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 290.88556701 199% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.13402061856 109% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6804123711 150% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0709804919 44.8134815571 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.631578947 76.5299724578 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57894736842 4.34317383033 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.29896907216 140% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184618221453 0.216113520407 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593151553045 0.0766984524023 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430726754002 0.0603063233224 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818009506532 0.12726935374 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470019693764 0.0580467560999 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 8.37731958763 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 8.71597938144 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 41.2886597938 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.