Even though hardship is inevitable, when encountering life obstacles such as career dissatisfaction or financial issues, people’s behavior can vary vastly. While some may choose to compromise with life, others attempt to surmount and flourish from the situation. I personally am of the latter belief and hold the opinion that everyone should be responsible and initiative in their own life.
On the one hand, it can be understandable for one to accept defeat in certain circumstances. For example, if the situation is irrevocable or is caused on a larger scale that is out of one’s control and authority, it will rather be a smart choice to just do nothing. However, as aforementioned, hardship in life is inevitable. Most of them root from external or internal reasons that can be resolved. Therefore, before deciding to accept a mundane life, one should always be willing to challenge life.
On the other hand, people who can overcome difficulties in life will most likely eventually walk a successful path. In comparison with the first mannerism, this approach to life is much more positive. It now does not act as an escapism but a self-defense mechanism nurtured by self-confidence and inner motivation. Because of that, one’s mentality will be strengthened through hardship and grow in life. Secondly, when one becomes proactive in their life, they grasp a sense of control over their destiny. As a result, they can stand firm through life and strive for the better.
In conclusion, although there are plausible elements affecting and reasoning for one’s decision when combat hardship in life, I believe that it is better to try and improve when encounters discourage situations since it can facilitate personal growth and prepare one for future life fluctuations.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...y eventually walk a successful path. In comparison with the first mannerism, this approach...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...through life and strive for the better. In conclusion, although there are plausi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...in life, I believe that it is better to try and improve when encounters discourage situ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21602787456 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05913820461 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6636861961 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941107217113 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305246274109 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027691445889 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664015621329 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291500222257 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...y eventually walk a successful path. In comparison with the first mannerism, this approach...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...through life and strive for the better. In conclusion, although there are plausi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...in life, I believe that it is better to try and improve when encounters discourage situ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21602787456 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05913820461 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6636861961 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941107217113 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305246274109 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027691445889 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664015621329 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291500222257 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.