The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in Australia, divided into three categories, from 2001- 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart is a pictorial illustration of the number of minutes of telephone calls in Australia, which have been made to various devices and localities from the years 2001 to 2008.
Based on the data sampled over the span of eight long years, an exponential rise is observed in the use of mobile phones. In the beginning of the 21st century, an approximate 2 billion minutes worth of calls were made from these wireless and handheld devices. By the end of the decade in 2008, the number had increased to 46 billion minutes, 20 times higher than its preceding estimate.
Similarly, a steady surge in minutes have also been recorded by national and international phone calls. However, they exhibit a higher proportion of call time compared to that of the mobile phones and maintained an even expansion throughout the decade.
The majority of the minutes are represented by the local telephones of the country. From 2001 to 2005, these local minutes follow the same trend as its accompanying categories on the chart. An exponential increase is yet again observed, rising from 72 billion minutes to 90 billion. Unfortunately, due to the growing popularity of mobile phones, the number of local minutes began to plunge after 2005 and continued to do so till 2008. As a consequence, the net number of minutes from local telephone calls showed no improvement.
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 78
- he diagram below shows how Olive Oil is manufactured Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 61
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96086956522 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79524643753 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582608695652 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3864911264 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.727272727 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260317598943 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103708091895 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767929472275 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159830742934 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093454591484 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.