The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001.
The three pie charts compare the proportion of expenditure on five categories (teachers’ salaries, furniture and equipment, resources, other workers’ salaries and insurance) of a school located in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, the majority of money each year was spent on teachers’ salaries whereas the least on insurance. Other workers’ salaries, and resources’ expenditure decreased over the period given. On the other hand, expenditure on furniture and equipment, and insurance overall increased.
In regard of teachers’ salaries, they grew 10% reaching a peak of 50% of the overall expenditure in 1991 but then decreased to 45%. As for insurance, it was merely 2% of the whole budget in 1981 but increased to 8% in the final year. Likewise, there was 8% growth in the money spent on furniture and equipment in the school’s outlay over the 20 year time period.
In 1981 other worker’s salaries accounted for 28% of the spending, then continually decreased to a low of 15% in 2001. Turning to resources, the expenditure grew for 5% between the first year and 1991 but then dropped to 9% in the last year.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in 6 countries 56
- The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 67
- The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 73
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in European country from 1979 to 2004 73
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, likewise, so, then, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03723404255 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95623635875 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.997530788 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120662780731 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496905452215 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079427753097 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918575633013 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973874907015 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.