The chart shows data on percentage of British people donating money by age from 18 to 65 for the years 1990 and 2010. According to the chart, there are 5 groups of British people, that collected by the age.
The smallest percentage of people in 1990 and 2010 that donated to charity are humans from 18 to 25. Therefore, the largest percent of people from age 36 to 50, contributed money more than other period of people age. In 1990, more percentage of people contributed money to charity than people in 2010. Also, in the same year 30 percent of people from 26 to 35 donated to charity, that is 5 percent more than people in this period of age in 2010. Furthermore, 39 percent of people from age 51 to 65, provided money to donation, that is approximately 4 percent more than people in the same period of age.
In addition, 35 percentage of people from age 65 and more participated in donation in 2010, that is about 4 percent more than people in this period of age
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010 67
- IELTS Writing Task 2 Some People Work For The Same Organization All Their Working Life Others Think That It Is Better To Work For Different Organizations Discuss Both These Views And Give Your Own Opinion 78
- The birth rate in most developed countries is predicted to begin to fall over the next 50 years By 2030 it is estimated that over one third of the population in most developed countries will be aged 65 and over What effects will these predictions have on 56
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants Other countries have no intention of doing this Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45197740113 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50729091023 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401129943503 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6901610544 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239463727881 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161751654677 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697514834964 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206503958863 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693809123436 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.