The given chart presents information on the percentage of British people in different age groups donating money to a charity in 1990 and 2010. However, across the two years, the pattern differs before and after the age 50.The percentage of people in the age 18-25 contributed the least at only 17% by 2010, these figures had fallen significantly to 35% and 7% respectively. Also the level of donations from the 26-35 age-group also experienced a decrease in 2010 from 31% to 25%. In 1990, 42% of the 36-50 age-group made charitable donations and this figure is the highest on the chart. On the other hand the percentage of people between 51 to 65 years were the second largest group in 1990 and rose to prominence in 2010. Whereas those above 63 years of age were the third largest group in 1990, they were equal to the 36 to 50 age group in 2010. While the percentage of donor increase till age group 36 to 51 in 1990 and declined thereafter, the contributors increased consistently till the age group 51 to 65 in 2010 and then declined.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of boys and girls who participate in 4 kinds of sport outside school hours including the percentage of those who do not
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ern differs before and after the age 50.The percentage of people in the age 18-25 c...
^^^
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...gnificantly to 35% and 7% respectively. Also the level of donations from the 26-35 a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58602150538 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65095200582 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8947454087 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222109832986 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128974993324 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978911979673 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222109832986 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.