some people think that understanding concepts is better for teaching students, others believe that learning facts is better, what do you prefer?
Undoubtedly education is nowadays essential for every single one in order to keep up with the unprecedented technological and scientific advancements. The methodology of education, on the other hand, remains controversial. Some people claim that just learning facts is very enough; others reckon that understanding concepts is of the essence for the educational attainment. I'd rather champion the viewpoint which backs up the comprehension of the educational disciplines in light of a couple of reasons I will be elaborating on hereafter.
Basically, understanding is of a paramount importance for investing in students as individuals. Using their brains to analyze information and turn around problems turns, by the time, learners into truth seekers through out boosting their reasoning skills and constructive criticism. As per Nature Magazine, building education on inducing pupils to resolves mathematical issues as well as independently researching unknown knowledge builds up broad neuro- networking, and enhances the urge to know the unvarnished the truth. And as such, those school kids become very powerful intellectually in addition to be open minded on facts upon graduation. Thus, this recent scientific finding shows how indispensable it is to instill such mental skills and enhance them via focusing on understanding and research.
On the contrary, not just is the rote learning in vain, but counterproductive as well. This is in the wake of the fact that concentrating on just memorizing facts without analysis or contemplation does not boost the mental capabilities of pupils. On top of this is, merely parroting curricular subjects is nothing but a waste of time and effort which usually ends up with school students hating on education entirely as it is extremely complicated and tedious. This is exemplified on by a cousin of mine whom was forced by his parents to just memorize all his school lessons without asking how or why. Thence\, by the time he has become seriously frustrated about school till he eventually dropped out. This proves that such an antiquated methodology backfires at students.
In conclusion, comprehending and analyzing is fruitful in education, yet just repeating learnt facts without pondering them and research is deleterious on the educational process. So, I am sided with intellectuality and an opponent of forcing learners to just closed minded chronicles.
- buzzing 3
- some people think that understanding concepts is better for teaching students others believe that learning facts is better what do you prefer 88
- Should young adults stay with their parents or leave them as soon as possible 76
- Some people think that hard work is the only way to achieve success other think that luck is behind it what opinion do you agree on 90
- TPO 19 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Undoubtedly education is nowadays essent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...essence for the educational attainment. Id rather champion the viewpoint which bac...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns I will be elaborating on hereafter. Basically, understanding is of a paramou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing their brains to analyze information and turn around problems turns, by the t...
^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...y the time, learners into truth seekers through out boosting their reasoning skills and con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocusing on understanding and research. On the contrary, not just is the rote le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l he eventually dropped out. This proves that such an antiquated methodology back...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted methodology backfires at students. In conclusion, comprehending and analyzi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ners to just closed minded chronicles.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still, then, thus, well, as for, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48924731183 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30300983557 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60752688172 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3945378133 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.117647059 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119773448949 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424016311958 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070757649512 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714612992227 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546453436566 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.