It is seriously concerned that household garbage is progressed insufficiently. Governments are considered to take the most important responsibility in exposing a strict legal obligation on treating household waste. Personally, I believe that laws are completely needed to deal with the problem, however, there should be others.
For starters, stringent regulation is the most effective way of rising waste recycled in residential houses. Therefore, laws should concentrate on instructing householders to separate all of their waste into different bins. Moreover, there should be punishments for people who fail to adhere to the given regulation, ranging from a small fine to community services, or even perhaps prison sentences for repeated offenders. For example, every redundant material in Singapore accommodations is classified, thus Singapore is among the top energy-efficient countries.
On the other hand, I suppose that the governments' law system is merely one of the numerous paths in encouraging people to expand recycled domestic waste. Therefore, governments should take more action, that can be “green campaign” with recycling slogan such as “3R for a better future” (reuse - reduce - recycle). Furthermore, in every educational institution, students need to be guided and promoted to recycle more, by all means, for their better well-being and the entire society's benefits.
To sum up, I do agree that legal regulations play an extremely significant role in increasing household garbage to be used more beneficially. However, I think that the problems can thoroughly be tackled if the residential consciousness is enhanced by governments going different paths.
- The bat chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 73
- The chart below gives information about the amount of time children spend with their parents 67
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... On the other hand, I suppose that the governments law system is merely one of the numerou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i suppose, i think, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77108433735 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30888906512 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650602409639 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6565773401 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250405141309 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823431920813 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534047149479 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133332712342 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064608373333 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.