It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason young workers are to be preferred.
As we live in a modern world, all things are changing day by day including work systems at workplace. It is believed that workers over 50 do no understand rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace, it is better to employ younger workers. I partly agree with this statement.
We can see many old people in some workplaces, there are several reasons why employers use older workers at workplaces. Firstly, some people believe that old people workers have more work experience than younger people. Obviously, in addition to necessary knowledge of the job, experience is also a thing, which employers need and this factor can be supported completely by old people.Secondly, workers over 50 often tend to find stable jobs, while young people do not have a patience to work in a same place for a long time.The third reason is responsibility, which is difficult to find in younger workers.Most of young people are working and studying at university at the same time.These people are very busy and do not do all their works on time, while old workers are less busy and more responsible.
The first element of modern workplace is responding rapidly to the changes and ideas, which can be seen in young people. For example, young people recognize technologies faster and easier than old people, which brings many benefits to company.Mull over, young people have capacities to deal than olders. There are pieces of testimony showed that majority of old people can not endure amount of pressures at work.
In conclusion, I think both old and young workers can be chosen for working at workplaces. Those two groups of people can make a good team.
- It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason young workers are to be preferred 56
- It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason young workers are to be preferred 58
- The graph below gives information about the progress of certain diseases during childhood between 1950 and 2000 in a developing country
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...n be supported completely by old people.Secondly, workers over 50 often tend to find sta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'patience'.
Suggestion: patience
...le jobs, while young people do not have a patience to work in a same place for a long time...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...to work in a same place for a long time.The third reason is responsibility, which i...
^^^
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Most
...is difficult to find in younger workers.Most of young people are working and studyin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...studying at university at the same time.These people are very busy and do not do all ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Mull
..., which brings many benefits to company.Mull over, young people have capacities to d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90647482014 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74341366067 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 142.832445327 49.4020404114 289% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259550078973 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109399173578 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892044286775 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172820919651 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413078476348 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.