The bar graph presents the amount of time the school teachers of four countries taught to three different sections a year in2001.
Overall, the teachers in every country spent more time in teaching for upper secondary students. The USA witnessed the highest teaching hours, while the teachers of Japan and Spain spent relatively similar number of hours for primary and lower secondary classes.
All four countries focused more on their eldest students, with the lowest of 700 hours in Japan to the highest of just under 1200 hours in the USA, while around 900 hours were spent on this division both in Spain and Iceland. The teaching hours are markedly higher in America, with 1000 hours for the lower secondary classes and about 750 hours for the primary grades, compared to 600 hours and just below 600 hours for these two divisions respectively in Iceland, where the lowest amount of time was given for these sections.
In terms of two lower sections, Japan and Spain demonstrated relatively similar patterns. While the primary classes were taught for 600 hours a year in Japan, Spanish primary students were taught around 650 hours. Similarly, for lower secondary classes, about 650 hours and roughly 750 hours were scheduled in Japan and Spain respectively.
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the process by which sheep embryis are cloned 61
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- The bar chart below shows the production of the world s oil in OPEC and non OPEC countries Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0956937799 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3638300678 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478468899522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4944442158 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234432204093 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11613114372 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829871115586 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169981804749 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848407975362 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.