The chart show give the amount oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020•
The delegated bar graph represents the information about the amount oil was discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020• The data has been given in Billion battlers year•
At the fleeting glance ; it is observed that the highest amount of oil found in 1965 was 55 billion barrels as compared to others• Followed by ; In 1950 the number of oil explored stood at tallest point 20 billion barrlers before it continued to rise and reached at highest peak point 55 billion barrels after that oil spatter rapidly decreased•
Probing further; it is lucid that from 1970 to 1975 almost similar billion barrels for oil was discovered • In contrast; the number of oil found was 25 billion barrels in 1980• but after that the amount of oil explored decreased with the difference of 10 billion barrels • However ; In 1990 and 2020 it showed fluctuations and oil discovered rapidly decreased in last years•
Overall; it is clear from bar graph that fluctuated trend in all years
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Billion'.
Suggestion: A Billion
...950 to 2020• The data has been given in Billion battlers year• At the fleeting glanc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompared to others• Followed by ; In 1950 the number of oil explored stood at tal...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by ; In 1950 the number of oil explored stood at tallest point 20 billion barrle...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fter that oil spatter rapidly decreased• Probing further; it is lucid that from 1...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95757575758 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57404518546 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 165.0 22.4926829268 734% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 818.0 112.824112599 725% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 165.0 22.9334400587 719% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 29.0 5.23603664747 554% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294640174817 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294640174817 0.103423049105 285% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186930766081 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111606614467 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 84.4 13.2329268293 638% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -70.62 61.2550243902 -115% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.1 10.3012195122 622% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.07 8.06136585366 187% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 68.0 10.9970731707 618% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.