Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
People, throughout the world, realize that study in extremely significant for their future development. It is often argued that people are preferred to study alone, whereas another school of thought suggest that studying in group are far more beneficial. I totally agree that there are many positive impacts on studying in groups. This essay will discuss both sides using example of Hong Kong and Oxford university to demonstrate the points and prove arguments.
On the one side, studying alone brings people more concentrate in their learning process. If there are a plethora disturbance by other people such as friends, classmates and family members, focusing to revision is interrupted. As a result, it wastes time unless they can find a suitable place for learning without others people. For instance in Hong Kong, young people tend to study individually, so that they would rather like to go to study rooms when after schools. Thus, although people are thrilled to have interaction with friends when they have revisions, studying alone have some positive impacts.
However, recent research suggests that learning efficiency can be improved by interactions. This is largely because experiencing the knowledge by sharing with others is crucial for study. An intensive research by Oxford university indicates that 90 percent student, who study in groups with classmates, have higher academic results than those study alone. As a result, students are divided into small groups for learning and are provided groups for handling some projects. Having benefits by learning in groups, it is recommended that students should learn with groups since there are many positive impacts.
To conclude, despite having positive outcomes by focusing on learning alone, it is more efficient by studying with groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | kwchung | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
- It is suggested that all the young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people 73
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008
- The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 73
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008
- The given diagram illustrates the possible way of the process of home energy production 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'intensive research'.
Suggestion: Intensive research
...aring with others is crucial for study. An intensive research by Oxford university indicates that 90 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44326241135 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6527121871 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0105755409 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317802276432 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108332008783 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586919628675 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19014546015 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612811636422 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.