Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere while others believe this is just the price of fame Discuss both sides and give your opinion

The term paparazzi is used to describe an unpleasant culture where freelance photographers take pictures of celebrities without their permission. Usually, it's more common to see these people near airport's and residences of star performers. In this context, it is widely debated, invading privacy of an individual just for some sensational comments is highly unethical. However, to the contrary few argue that such trend is result of fame they procure because of their status. Even before arriving a conclusion, let's discuss these both diametrically opposite views and arrive an opinion.

Advanced technology in electronics and gadgets lead to invention of modern camera. With the help of these equipment's, it's very easy to take photos of film actors and other known personalities. Whereas, little attention is given to the fact that such unwarranted activities might destroy their career. On the other hand, right to privacy is fundamental to every one irrespective of their social status. No amount of popularity and fame can justify this erratic behaviour. Moreover, public has no time to focus on such frivilous instances and hardly get any appreciation. Certainly, it's not far from true, sports personalities and cinema professionals are 'eye candy' to the common man. Nonetheless, it's no reason to disturb them when they are seriously attending their duties. On some occassions these unlawful recordings might cause accidents. For instance, Princess Diana met her fateful day because of this paparazzi nature.

Obviously, we all have tendency to be curious about lifestyle of our favourite hero or athlete. Exactly, this interest in society gives incentive to reporters and journalists to follow them everywhere. In order to procure rare and unseen images cameraman try to intrude in private life of famous people. At the same time, they have no clue that they are perpetrators of unlawful nuisance. Social media and online platforms are some streaming places to see these photos. Despite of strict laws these sort of infringements are happening now and then. Currently, vigilance cyber officers are dealing these cases and recent enactments penalizing illicit photography. Therefore, people with digital lens should be careful before they use it.

After understanding cause and affect of paparazzi, in my opinion, it's totally unjustified to stalk celebrities. In conclusion, we should not encourage such publications and channels who commercialise name and fame of talented persons for their own benefits.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m actors and other known personalities. Whereas, little attention is given to the fact ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e candy to the common man. Nonetheless, its no reason to disturb them when they are...
^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'images'' or 'image's'?
Suggestion: images'; image's
...re. In order to procure rare and unseen images cameraman try to intrude in private lif...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...ee these photos. Despite of strict laws these sort of infringements are happening now and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[15]
Message: Did you mean 'cause and effect'?
Suggestion: cause and effect
...re they use it. After understanding cause and affect of paparazzi, in my opinion, its total...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing cause and affect of paparazzi, in my opinion, its totally unjustified to stal...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47557840617 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96164934276 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658097686375 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.3759073418 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.2 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.56 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227699188149 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487277920069 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447275672747 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126999297224 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533208771559 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m actors and other known personalities. Whereas, little attention is given to the fact ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e candy to the common man. Nonetheless, its no reason to disturb them when they are...
^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'images'' or 'image's'?
Suggestion: images'; image's
...re. In order to procure rare and unseen images cameraman try to intrude in private lif...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...ee these photos. Despite of strict laws these sort of infringements are happening now and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[15]
Message: Did you mean 'cause and effect'?
Suggestion: cause and effect
...re they use it. After understanding cause and affect of paparazzi, in my opinion, its total...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing cause and affect of paparazzi, in my opinion, its totally unjustified to stal...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47557840617 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96164934276 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658097686375 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.3759073418 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.2 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.56 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227699188149 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487277920069 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447275672747 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126999297224 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533208771559 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.