Do you agree or disagree with the statement that it is always right for governments to ask people to move their businesses and houses to provide space for the construction of large structures (new roads, new dams, etc).
This is a pretty controversial question. Sometimes it's the only proper choice for government with no alternatives. However, some families can get down in the dumps while losing their dwellings, covered with memories and history. To my mind, it's not right to force people change their place of living. Nevertheless, if there is no choice, equal exchange should be provided.
First and foremost, in my consideration, your place of living is connected with a chunk of memories, which could be important and extremely valuable. Your entire childhood can be spend in that house, which you would like to visit every now and then and spend time with your parents, searching your memory for cheerful and pleasant moments, spent within the territory of the building. For some families, an edifice can contain a lot of history. In some cases, houses have been kept for centuries, going from one dynasty to another. Therefore, forcing people to permanently wipe out such an important part of their lives is unacceptable.
Secondly, if we take a look on the situation from the economical aspect, not always people receive similar conditions compared to those they have lost.
In a great deal of cases, a one-family house can be exchanged to a flat, which is not equal. I am convinced that people won't have a lot to choose from, and the proposals will be worse than their former place of living. Another variant could be an exchange for money. However, due to the constant inflation, the price of your house most surely declined, and it will be impossible to buy the same dwelling for earned amount of money. Thereby, people can have tough times in their lives, if they don't receive financial help from the government or building company.
To sum up, I consider the idea of replacing history and a bunch of memories with new constructions as a one that should be forgotten. Of course, the circumstances can leave people without a choice, but if there is a possibility of relocating the new object, it should be done in first place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Rustin_Panda | 86 | view |
- The expression Never never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The belief that animals can sense an earthquake before it occurs has been held since at least the ancient Greeks Countries such as China and Japan which suffer frequently from the devastation brought about by seismic disturbances have a long history of at 3
- nbjdhfgoidsjkopq w 3
- If you could go to some time and place in the future when and where would you go Why Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 60
- nkldfngkler 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...retty controversial question. Sometimes its the only proper choice for government w...
^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... with memories and history. To my mind, its not right to force people change their ...
^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...at house, which you would like to visit every now and then and spend time with your parents, searc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ave tough times in their lives, if they dont receive financial help from the governm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, of course, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88695652174 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73052093775 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9472768572 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188490269897 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589519864806 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328479990161 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101613431305 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290221416041 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.