The government now plans to establish some car-free zones in the center of the city. Some like this plan for they believe it can help eliminate traffic congestion, while others dislike it because not being able to reach places like stores and restaurants by car is very inconvenient to them. What do you think of this plan and why?
Big cities are drowning in traffic issues and are becoming more uncomfortable for pedestrians. From my point of view, it's a brilliant idea to create some space that will be forbidden for cars. There are some advantages, which will be described further. Anyway, to me they are covering all diadvantages of the idea completely.
First and foremost, pedestrians will be provided with more space for walking. Being able to sit in front of a cafe without breathing emmissions from cars is what a majority of cities need. Moreover, instead of the road, some trees and flowers can be planted to make buildings in the city center more likable. I have read about a similar project, which was implemented in Vienna recently. It was extremely successful, causing no objections and severe problems for residents and tourists.
Secondly, this decision will be a stymulus for people to walk more and to become more sporty. Nowadays, a vast amount of world population is suffering from unsufficient moving and instant sitting in front of the computer or TV. It is definitely a good idea to take a walk to the supermarket after your job. It's well-known that physical activities increase happines and provide human with energy.
Last but not least, the government will surely propose some alternatives for people. Although it's a pleasant project, it can still be uncomfortable for someone. In my opinion, bikes or some vehicles for people with children could be proposed for free or for rent. This solution has already been implemented in a lot of cities around the world. In Moscow, for instance, you can rent a bike and ride it almost everywhere, using particular space on the roads or pavements. Moreover, you can leave it where it's comfortable for you, without a need to go back to the place where you borrowed it.
To sum up, I consider this project as a good start to make cities more pedestrians-friendly. Of course not everyone will be pleased with that decision. Nevertheless, these days it's crucial to care about your health and about environment. With reducing the amount of traffic, more trees will be plented and more cleaner air we are breathing in will become. Also, with implementing more available and secure space, city center will become more comfortable for children and animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-11 | Llsnxbdjzbbab263646 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that in the future schools should no longer be necessary because children can obtain information from the Internet 76
- The expression Never never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- nbjdhfgoidsjkopq w 3
- If you could go to some time and place in the future when and where would you go Why Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 60
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it 1 touring historic sites 2 going to markets or shops 3 eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...for pedestrians. From my point of view, its a brilliant idea to create some space t...
^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... some alternatives for people. Although its a pleasant project, it can still be unc...
^^^
Line 9, column 307, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
...traffic, more trees will be plented and more cleaner air we are breathing in will become. Al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, of course, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99738903394 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87877686587 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556135770235 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.4745353359 48.9658058833 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.75 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9583333333 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185905724084 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572209182098 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434470669843 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111549308591 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510147399012 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.