In some parts of world, schools have restricted the use of mobile phone. Is it a positive development or negative development? Give your opinion and why
In most schools around the world students have their own cell phonrs. While these devices can undoubtly play a role in safety, connectedness and learning, many schools have chosen to restrict their use on campus. This essay will discuss as to why restriction on phone in school is a postive development and will provide evidence to strengthen its arguement.
Restricting phone use in classroom itself improves learning. Since it will reduce distraction that can be caused by the device. For example, students will not have the urge to check their phone once in a while. So that will keep their attention to the lessons. If school authority allows student to use their cell phones on campus that will lessen their attention span and gradually it will have a long time effect on their studies. Hence, banning phones in the class keeps students attention while studying which is necessary for better learning.
Lesser use of phone improves wellbeing . Because, it will keep stuidents healthy not only physically but also mentally and socially. For instance, students are restricted to use their phones on campus so they can engage them in physical activities or talk to others and make new friends in their free periods. As a result, they will remain healthy, happy and improve their social skills. Whereas, if students will use their phone on their leisure time instead of playing or making friends, it can result them into being socially awkward and aloof in nature. They can also become obese or physically unfit due to the lack of physical activities. However, restricting phone use can be helpful to ensure the betterment of students.
Instead of having so many perks such as connectedness and providing safety, the cons of using a phone on campus outweigh its pros. Moreover, the restriction on phone use on campus is certainly a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-18 | shanu67890 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in classroom itself improves learning. Since it will reduce distraction that can be ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e to check their phone once in a while. So that will keep their attention to the lesson...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... Lesser use of phone improves wellbeing . Because, it will keep stuidents healthy...
^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Instead of having so many perks such as connectedness and providing safety, the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0487012987 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61312783293 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1168641629 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3888888889 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20737524578 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812946094096 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653681711026 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159304069206 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066123861702 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.