Sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas (1999 & 2004)
The tables contain sales records of coffee and banana labelled under Fairtrade in five European countries between year 1999 and 2004. Earnings are in millions of euros.
Overall, sales of both products undergo tremendous growth throughout the year except Sweden and Denmark, which suffered a minor loss in banana sales. Switzerland stood at the top in the list of banana trade for both years whereas for coffee Switzerland was overtaken by UK at the end with enormous difference.
Once Switzerland was at the top for coffee trade with earnings of 3 million euros which got almost doubled after 5 years but UK surpassed it in 2004 with a rise in income from 1.5 in beginning to 20 million euros in 2004. Sales report of Denmark, Belgium and Sweden remained under 2 million euros.
Banana sales table depicts Switzerland was the ruler in both years with earnings of 15 and 47 million in 1999 and 2004 respectively. UK with sales figure 5.5 million in 2004 stood at second while Belgium with figure of 0.6 and 4 million euros in 1999 and 2004 respectively was at third in the list. In contrast with others sales of Sweden and Denmark decreased over time and stood under 2 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-14 | christine221 | view |
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand Do you agree or disagree 84
- Sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas 1999 2004 81
- Geothermal power plant 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- Frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the USA 2003 2013 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...spectively was at third in the list. In contrast with others sales of Sweden and Denmark...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, whereas, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47351226775 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50243902439 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6228009725 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318101157774 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148283617178 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148959855788 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236141610263 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144730854981 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.