The author of the article suggests that this type of dinosaur was the inactive hunter and preferred to eat dead animals and eggs. However, the lecture argued that R. robustus was an active hunter and could be hunted on other dinosaurs.
The reader and the lecture discuss the issue about the dinosaur Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus) and his type of hunting. Was he an active or passive hunter? That is the question. The author of the article suggested that this type of dinosaur was the inactive hunter and preferred to eat dead animals and eggs. However, the lecture argued that R. robustus was an active hunter and could be hunted on other dinosaurs.
First of all, the author presented us a theory that R. robustus was too small, only as a domestic animal, to eta another dinosaur. The article provided us with information that adult psittacosaurs found in his stomach were too big, up to two meters in the high. The lector challenged this point. She said that R. robustus could eat babies of these big dinosaurs. Moreover, she pretended that this type of dinosaurs was an active hunter because she found the correct proportion between R. robustus and their sacrifices: a sacrifice should be smaller twice times than the predator.
Secondly, the author contended that R. robustus had short limbs. The dinosaur could not catch up with any psittacosaurs because they were faster than R. robustus. Nonetheless, the lector rebuts this argument. She asserted that short legs could help him to achieve up to 15 km. per hour in his hunting. Furthermore, it was enough to catch hold of the psittacosaurs.
Finally, the author cast doubt about the question of the absence of sign teeth on the victim’s body and bones. If the dinosaur was an active hunter, we should find the sign of teeth. On the other hand, the lector opposed this point because that these species did not use their back teeth and preferred to swallow their sacrifice wholly or with huge parts.
- School administrators at an elementary school have recently decided to increase the amount of hours spent teaching kids about robotics computer programming and other elements of science and technology However they were forced to reduce the amount of hours 90
- Many students start looking for jobs as soon as they graduate Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- The table gives information about the land covered by forests in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with a forecast for 2015 78
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools Do you agree or disagree with this prediction 90
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd could be hunted on other dinosaurs. First of all, the author presented us a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...smaller twice times than the predator. Secondly, the author contended that R. r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh to catch hold of the psittacosaurs. Finally, the author cast doubt about the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86440677966 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54109346339 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515254237288 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 13.0662251656 191% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1328593549 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.4 110.228320801 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.04 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.27373068433 328% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528262411867 0.272083759551 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12652786362 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150102336848 0.0662205650399 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331960589255 0.162205337803 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243217232843 0.0443174109184 549% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.3589403974 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.02 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.