In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Many individuals opine that the number of cars will drop throughout the next 20 years. I, however, disagree with the following statement. With the development of modern technologies inside cars, people are not in the need of a new transportation system. Soon enough, there will be an abundant amount of innovations in the world of cars, which simply cover many of the problems that they face nowadays, like air pollution and car accidents.
To begin with, cars that run on fuel are very harmful for our environment. Vehicle pollutants contain greenhouse gases that cause climate change. Burning gasoline and diesel fuel releases a big amount of injurious products in our environment. Fortunately, all of these problems have a solution. With the recent development of the Tesla car and other various electric vehicles, pollution will cease to exist. For example, the climate and air in many countries has improved with the introduction of Tesla. Urban areas may now become more luxuriant, which is a significant benefit for any modern city. In addition, electric vehicle owners are not concerned with the fuel cost in inflation, consequently, the amount of fuel that petroleum refineries produce will exponentially decrease, making the air cleaner.
Furthermore, unlike cars that were manufactured 3-5 years ago, new vehicles will have an enhanced security and safety level. Throughout the recent years, there have been numerous car accidents which were not left unseen by many people. Innovations linked with safety will play a crucial role in transportation developments, which provide a number of benefits for car users. People tend to trust cars more than many other transportation system, leading to a significant increase in individuals who commonly utilise cars for work and travelling, which is beneficial for many companies. Therefore, the amount of car accidents on the road will significantly decrease, making this problem of secondary importance.
In conclusion, technology will evolve in a way that will maintain the safety of car users and our environment, leading to an increase in the number of private transport utilisers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 76
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 78
- Teachers affect students more than other students 76
- Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part time job in their free time What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message State your opinion 67
- The reading passage argues that R robustus was unlikely to be a predator However the lecturer provides the evidence in favour of the idea that the stated mammal could have been a successful hunter 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39583333333 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0983029126 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7502827863 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.722222222 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185880062382 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576153298264 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525594561454 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123463263168 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044165734376 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.