If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt urges that any steps or means are to be considered justifiable providing that the goal is worthy of. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly disagree" with the concept and hereby obliged to provide necessary elaboration of some points in defense of my position.
To begin with - it might not be too presumptuous to expect that a goal is not to be sure kind of thing. That is to - the goal of an individual will remain nascent until the time come. He or she will not be sure to attain it; yet he or she will do the necessities to get upto that. So, now considering that person has an ambition to attain a seat in a certain governmental party to serve his society; which is great. And so on in order to grab that position he might do two kinds works. First one is to encourage people to vote for him, cheer up for him and champion him. Anotehr prospect is that - he might try to commit some harms to the people of other's part; for insatance the opposing party - in order to gain the trust of his one. It does not wait to be said that the second one is not a very commendable one to do and so for this he might be punished by loosing his ticket to the party. Yet irony is that, even of doing such kind of activities he might get ticket to the party and he will get his desired seat ultimately. But what can we say about the path he has followed to reach his goal? Surely it does not have any acceptibility in a civilized society and that is why his ideology should be condemned. This instance can exactly exemply us why it will not be justifiable to the "any means" one will take in order to gain his or her goal.
Apart from that - the concept of worthy has a diverse meaning in this context. Whether the worthiness is considered with respect to the individual or it is being regarded as the service for greater purpose. It is pretty simple one to analyze. If it is worthy for a single one and his well rounded "all means" and "all ways" are not causing any nuisance for the people in the society then it is commendable; although how much impact would those imply one his mental and physical health will remain a question. On the other side, if his means are conduicive for him but not for the layperson - then all those means are to reprimand. Now comes the bigger picture. If one individual is very ambitious in his own vision and want to attain that by any means - then it might be considered from the perspective of his fellow or surrounding people or even to the subjects the means might influence. It has been seen in the very second parable how mischiefs harm the society and it should not be allowed to do any kind of those to attain the goal. However, what if the means might not be deleterious towards the people but to other beings; and surprisingly people might not be vocal of this? Will that make the so-called "any means" justifiable to the society? The answer ios obviously a big "NO". For instance - an authority wants to make the environment clean and wants to destroy all the small trees which are considered to be garbages to them. Surprisingly people of that area are not vocal and might even have no idea about the consequences. Now, if the authority cut downs all those small ones, then it might affect the environment; the temperature might increase, birds might loose their habitations and all over the people around those places will suffer in the run. So, it definitely a poor way to complice the goal for the authority; although it is having no dissence from the people.
Considering the fact that in some cases, to accomplish the goal of bigger picture, an individual or even the authortiy needs to take some bold actions to serve that purpose. Those actions might not be even welcomed by the mass people. However, if the authority or the individual has the prudence to achieve that goal and have the courage, then they should continue this, even after being unwelcomed by his people. It might not be the case that - the simple people will always be correct in their decisions and that is why better decision have to be taken by authority. Sincerely, this "steps" and "measures" includes - any kind of better considerations although that seems to be extreme; not the ones that is unsure of its result and might not held any firmness of greater success.
So, looking at the points mentioned above it might be safe to conclude that - the authentication of the means followed by an individual is subjected to the perspectives of the beings that are being influenced by those efforts. However, sincere balance has to be made whenever those measures and means requires extreme efforts to be accomplished.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-05 | Shreya Singh | 50 | view |
2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 74
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 69
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 62
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book m 58
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one hi', 'a hi', or simply 'his'?
Suggestion: one hi; a hi; his
...hough how much impact would those imply one his mental and physical health will remain ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1714, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...temperature might increase, birds might loose their habitations and all over the peop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, well, apart from, as to, for instance, kind of, in some cases, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 52.0 19.5258426966 266% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 92.0 33.0505617978 278% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 108.0 58.6224719101 184% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3887.0 2235.4752809 174% => OK
No of words: 844.0 442.535393258 191% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60545023697 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.38996086189 4.55969084622 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71859614907 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 340.0 215.323595506 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.402843601896 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1233.0 704.065955056 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0661639892 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.972222222 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119029468853 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387561083781 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324487736822 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777276543532 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407578740989 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.