There is a big influence of peer groups on children’s behaviour. Do advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? What can be done about it?
Human is a social animal that willingly or unwillingly tends to socialise with others aiming to initiate a relationship where an exchange of traits is highly likely to happen. Most often, youngsters in school share a symbiotic relationship, which potentially affects their overall development in numerous ways. Debatably, a logical explanation of mutual trait exchange among students is quite subtle; however, simplified merits and demerits are detailed in forthcoming paragraphs.
Irrefutably, a companion’s influence plays a colossal role in the overall development of child’s conscience and personality while its positivity relies on the quality of fellowship. Moreover, since most of the learners improvise themselves being on the ground of friendly competency among peers, a student’s academics and communication capabilities are pivotally reliant on peers as well. This potentially portrays the need of an academically favourable companionship for a school-goer. Despite lucid benefits of having an advantageous social circle in school, circumstantial factors hindering conscience may sometimes lead youngsters towards the bad company.
Consequently, the peer pressure from an unfavourable social ground has significantly more adverse effects than the benefits of landing in a good company. The most basic categorization of children can vividly be based on the level of dominance. While initial goal of majority of students is improvised grades, highly dominant students have been noted to have forcibly influenced other students into off-goal activities like smoking, alcohol consumption etcetera. Moreover, peer pressure caused flunks have been vividly evident in most schools as an outcome of symbiotically toxic friendships that children fall into.
Summing up, I believe that merits and demerits of peer influence is unconditionally dependent on the person’s choice of friends. Looking onto the solution, parents must find themselves responsible for keeping a check on their offspring’s company to ensure better upbringing, because the destructive possibilities of child’s career by dominant peers outweigh the potential benefits of a good amity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-03 | Lakshay029 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that hosting international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
- There is a big influence of peer groups on children s behaviour Do advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages What can be done about it 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98397435897 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30407368897 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647435897436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5837474118 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.615384615 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116627597166 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415012158238 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363268595667 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065441113374 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383255694432 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.