Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
A few people work for the same company all their working life while others think that it is better to work for different organisation. This essay intends to highlight the both the views and my forth at last.
The prominent point to be consisdered is that, if people do work all the life in same organisation then they make perfect in that work. In future if they want to open their company then they can open it due to their knowledge and experience which is achieved by their working skills. To add on, working for the same company for whole life due to this people also get promotion in their life as well as they earn better salary or wages in their life. Another point is that, due to knowledge and experience people also get opportunities to work in better or top organosation.
On the flip side, firstly, working for different organisation people get a knowledge and experience about different work and they cannot feel bored to work in different companies. Secondly, individuals know about the rules and regulations as well as learn the working styles of the different organisation. Working in different association owing to this dwellers meet with different person in their life and learn their lifestyle, communication skills as well as their culture. It helps to increase their knowledge about different companies.
In conclusion, working in same association people make perfect in their life and also get reward and opportunities to work in other top companies. However, in different organisation people cannot feel bored and they enjoy their life with meet new people and new style of their work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-04 | sonia 7022 | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | sonia 7022 | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | sonia 7022 | 56 | view |
- Two maps show the changes of a coastal town called Pentland from 1957 to 2007 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people Make Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The tables given below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1990 and 2004 in five european countries 67
- students today can access information online so libraries are not necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph on the right shows the way of people of somecountry in invested their money during the years 2001 2006 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the same company for whole life due to this people also get promotion in their life...
^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rking in different association owing to this dwellers meet with different person in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94852941176 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74499190096 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 176.041082164 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408088235294 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7486625249 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53972217114 0.244688304435 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237493220069 0.084324248473 282% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150375963364 0.0667982634062 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.398950102953 0.151304729494 264% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805699054313 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.