Micro Management that supports monitoring of emails by the employees is a potential requirement for a corporate to establish a firm hold amidst the challenging environment posed by technology. The prompt puts forward the advantages of implementing such regulations at the employee level in order to achieve certain performance heuristics like reducing the waste of resources, system optimization as well as protection against any lawsuits. In my opinion, it is highly essential to have a separate portfolio to micro manage the employee's emails and other task related approaches. There are three main consequences for issuing a monitoring system at employee level.
The Primary consequence will be a drastic change in the performance rate and quality by the employee. As there is a high possibility for the employee to realize that such vigilance network would distill unnecessary emails and personal agendas, which in turn could affect his appraisal of the year, he/she works genuinely for better recognition at the managerial level. For instance, nowadays peers in the office are much prone to use email for personal chatting and contacting their folks which they consider would not charge them any. Such activities from an employee tends to increase the cost optimization in a project. Hence, it's worthwhile to assign a body of invigilators to check the emails and it's correspondence such that the budget of the project is optimized comparatively.
Security issues and breach of data are trending issues given the backdrop of hackers who send phishing emails even through the official identities of an organization. Thus, a routine monitoring on the emails of their company could preclude phishers containing virus links. However, creating a warning session for the employees is another way to prevent them from opening suspected emails. Though there may be awareness among the employees, a body of cybersecurity department inspecting the emails surely has an upper hand over these security breach issues. To exemplify, consider an organization that circulates it's financial data to the required team along with the proper authentication. Nevertheless, just a click at the fingertip on a virus contained email is enough to share the massive information to hackers. Therefore, a watchful team to tackle such catastrophic events is very much required.
Finally, monitoring emails may lead to a better evaluation of employee's appraisal for the year. A track of events and emails that increments the measuring capacity of an employee outweighs the primitive methods of just scoring the employee based on his performance.
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 60
- Some people say that saving money is good way and other say that spending money is the best way to enjoy life Discuss both views and your opinion 84
- governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
- Nowadays more and more people prefer to buy fashionable clothes Does this have positive or negative effect Give reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political t 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this security' or 'these securities'?
Suggestion: this security; these securities
...he emails surely has an upper hand over these security breach issues. To exemplify, consider a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41564792176 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07121414664 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572127139364 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4878626474 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.055555556 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193376173399 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604946440609 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478251379236 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117105363155 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436551227152 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.