In our modern life, fast foods are so notable becoming increasingly and eventually replace traditional foods and methods of food preparation. Some people think that it is so convenient using this type of foods, however, in my opinion more utilizing convenience foods can lead to unhealthy life style and consumption of traditional foods does not lead to poisoning and illnesses.
Let's begin by looking at convenience foods' comforts such as when we are urgent times, the most people eat fast foods because this type of foods are very easy and quick to prepare. Turning to the other side, more eating convenience foods can lead to anaemia and some illnesses in people's organism.
Secondly, fast foods are replacing traditional foods due to their convenience. In addition, convenience foods do not require much knowledge either. Because for making traditional foods which requires a lot of knowledge and skills. A person who does not know how to prepare traditional foods cannot cook such foods.
Another issue is that semi-finished products are now sold in almost all the shops around us and any people can buy this type of food. We don't even know if such foods sold in the store are of good quality or not. What I mean by this is that some products don't have a date on the packaging and this food may have been left in the store for a long time. Also convenience foods are a lot of advertising on TV. Therefore, the government should permit convenience foods which is advertising.
All things considered, more eating fast foods are never healthy even though it has some conveniences. Personally, traditional foods can lead to healthy lifestyle.
- In many countries students attend private cram schools for extra coaching in test taking techniques What is your view of this practice 56
- In many countries students attend private cram schools for extra coaching in test taking techniques What is your view of this practice 78
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 91
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...not lead to poisoning and illnesses. Lets begin by looking at convenience foods c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ny people can buy this type of food. We dont even know if such foods sold in the sto...
^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...at I mean by this is that some products dont have a date on the packaging and this f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...been left in the store for a long time. Also convenience foods are a lot of advertis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, i mean, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97833935018 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76795269491 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2861838993 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472083394202 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189107389022 0.084324248473 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939733055958 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286006217802 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959776717838 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.