The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008

The Bar Chart illustrates the percentage of people who consumed five varieties of fruits and Vegetable per day in the UK within 5 years.
It is shown that, women are the highest consumers of Vegetable and Fruits among the 3 categories of people, while children are the least consumers throughout the reporting years. Consumption of Fruit and Vegetable variety on daily basis has considerably shooting among Women reaching its peak in 2006 with about 40%, until 2007, the percentage begins to drop. The least percentage of women ate Fruit and Vegetable on daily basis is in 2001, which indicates less than 20%.
On the other hand, Men also consumed higher than Children did, highest consumption among Men within the given years is in 2006 and 2007 which accounted for more than 25%, and there’s a slight decrease in 2008. Men ate portion of Fruits and Vegetable less in 2001, 2002, and 2003, which shows slightly more than 15% within three years in raw. Moreover, Children always consumed less as shown on the Chart, as they consumed less than 15% on three consecutive years (2001, 2002 and 2003). Whereas they ate highest in 2006 and 2007, with more than 25%.
In conclusion, Women ate fruit and Vegetable higher than Men and Children. While men consume less than women do, but always higher than Children. The percentages are static at some points, but it is indicating a slight drop in the percentages across all the categories of People towards 2007 and 2008.

Votes
Average: 3.6 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'packs'?
Suggestion: packs
...s considerably shooting, and reached it pack in 2006 with about 40%, until 2007, the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
..., Men also consumed higher than Children, highest consumption among Men within the given ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f\Fruits and Vegetable less in 2001,2002 ,and 2003, which shows slightly more than...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98156682028 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63732199524 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8998910674 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219656702542 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10440488654 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982353986456 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169063347011 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976997679244 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.