The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The provided bar chart presents information about how many people in the UK have fruits and vegetables five times a day over the period 2001 to 2008. The given data measured in percent.
Women had the highest percentage of eating such health food throughout the period from about 23% in 2001 to a little more 30% in 2005. After peaking at 40% the following year, this trend had fallen to the 2005 figure by 2008. Speaking about men, after 16% plateau between 2001 and 2003 there was a sharp decrease from 22% to 27% and then a slight decline with 26% figure had followed by the end of period.
As far as youngsters concerned, they had the similar situation like men with only difference of 10 points less in every year over the period in question. With the exceptional of two last years when the gap between men and children had been shorten to 5 %.
To sum up, although vegetable and fruit diet was popular most of all among women in 2006, the gap between the three categories had narrowed considerably over the last three years.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Ielts writing task 1 The two maps below show an island before and after construction of tourist facilities 78
- Some people belive that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. 71
- Films and games can be accessed at any time from mobile devices, the smart phones, tablets and laptop computers. Do the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantades? 89
- Ielts writing task 1 The two maps below show an island before and after construction of tourist facilities 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'shortened'.
Suggestion: shortened
...e gap between men and children had been shorten to 5 %. To sum up, although vegetable...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, speaking about, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5752688172 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31797055702 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650537634409 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2655379305 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166230161757 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697900720702 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101721179387 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108256494638 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110256784097 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.