The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the UK residents consuming five portions of fruit and vegetables in a day, between the year 2001 and 2008. In overview, all people, men, women, and children, had similar patterns with different details in eating five portions of both fruit and vegetables per day during the period.
In more details, there was five percent difference between men and children in daily consuming five portions of fruit and vegetables in 2001, accounted for 17% and 12%, respectively. The numbers of both people, men and children, experienced stable trends until 2003, and then sharply increased at about 27% for men in 2006, and around 25% for children in 2007, further both underwent slight declines in 2008 at around 26% for men and about 24% for children, being the lowest percentage among others. Meanwhile, the numbers of British women were also reported to grow sharply from above 20% in 2001 to about 35% in 2006, being the highest numbers among others, and then it dropped at about 30% in 2008.
- The graph below gives information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1990 and the present with projections to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 49
- the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in home in UK 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at le 61
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produce. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'reported growing'.
Suggestion: reported growing
... the numbers of British women were also reported to grow sharply from above 20% in 2001 to about...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5034788848 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0537681809 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.6 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248443527156 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169356300097 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121160084124 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24157546352 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124580936647 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.