A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The notion that states should enforce standard curricula for their populace is the center of some contention. There are multiple angles to address this proposal: an authoritarian outlook that is supported by ideas of unity and cultural homogeneity within the citizenry is being adopted in various regimes around the world; whereas countries that tout individualism will see the former as an affront to even basic human rights. It is clear from empirical data surrounding rates of success in business, academia, and cultural output; that not mandating a uniform curriculum is the consensus model for successful nations in the modern age. This essay will attempt to elucidate the reasons why.
To begin with formulating the financial strength of a country when its nationals are allowed to venture into unrestricted domains in their academic career, we need look no further than the contrast between the GDPs of first- and third-world countries. In first-world countries, where government does not insert itself in the market in any form, the standard of living is generally higher. Schools are unrestrained in this regard, and students of superior intellect can study extra-carricular activities, advance quicker than their peers, or even take college classes years before their peers! If this freedom were not allowed in capitalist countries, I believe they would not have developed so greatly compared to centrally-planned economies.
To make a second point about freedoms to choose ones subjects of study, international prizes in literature and art have almost always gone to recipients who developed their intellectual curiosity at a strikingly young age. Rote learning can not possibly produce the great thinkers of the world who generate transformative art. States with national curricula like China, Iran, or Saudi Arabia are more concerned with maintaining a national identity than developing a thriving intellectual elite, especially is those intellectual seek to produce work that threatens its very existence. This fear is not seen in countries without a national curricula like the United States or the United Kingdom.
To sum up, while this issue will continue to be debate for years to come, as the science and economics of the matter will likely not be settled any time soon, I believe the aforementioned arguments are sufficient to discourage the notion of a standard curriculum for school student. It is certain that proponents of this measure will cite reasons pertaining to government regulation being the standard bearer to guide a unifying vision for the country, this argument is moot when talking about individual pupipls, as their intellectual curiosity can ever thrive under regulation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 72
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather and lo 68
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...a second point about freedoms to choose ones subjects of study, international prizes...
^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to can'
Suggestion: to can
...t a strikingly young age. Rote learning can not possibly produce the great thinkers...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, third, whereas, while, talking about, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43971631206 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96220418499 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609929078014 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0237298956 60.3974514979 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.0 118.986275619 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5384615385 23.4991977007 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127491435521 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039909624961 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041435876714 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706820614778 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294196432868 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 14.1392134831 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.